CustomLMSdevelopmentbuiltforyourpedagogy.
Custom learning management systems for K-12, higher education, and corporate training. Course authoring, assessments, gradebook, SCORM and xAPI, multi-tenant. We build LMS platforms that fit your model, not the other way around.
Daily active users
Peak requests per minute
Products shipped
Downtime through migrations
Platforms at three inflection points.
K-12 LMS for districts
- Who
- EdTech companies selling LMS into K-12 school districts.
- Problem
- Districts need SIS integration, FERPA compliance, parent visibility, and admin reporting that off-the-shelf LMS products handle poorly.
- What we do
- K-12-specific LMS with district-grade features. Multi-tenant for selling to many districts.
Higher education LMS
- Who
- Universities or higher-ed product companies needing LMS that fits their pedagogy.
- Problem
- Off-the-shelf LMS forces semester-based, course-section workflows. Modern higher ed needs flexibility, competency-based progression, micro-credentials, cross-institution credit transfer.
- What we do
- Higher-ed LMS with flexible learning models. LTI integration with publisher content. Faculty-centric authoring tools.
Corporate training LMS
- Who
- Companies building L&D platforms for internal training, customer education, or partner enablement.
- Problem
- Corporate training has different patterns than academic, cohorts, certifications with renewal, role-based learning paths, integration with HRIS.
- What we do
- Corporate LMS with HRIS integration, certification tracking, and role-based learning paths. xAPI for learning analytics.
Where platforms break. And how we rebuild them.
SCORM player incompatibility
The pain: Existing course library was authored in SCORM 1.2 but the LMS only supports xAPI. Re-authoring 800 courses is not realistic.
Our approach: SCORM-compatible runtime layer alongside xAPI. SCORM content runs in an isolated player with state translation to the modern data layer. New content authored in xAPI.
Assessment integrity at scale
The pain: Online assessments need integrity controls, proctoring, randomization, time limits, but the platform was built without them and retrofitting is expensive.
Our approach: Assessment delivery as a separate service with proctoring integration points. Question pool with weighted randomization. Time-limit enforcement at the server, not the client. Audit log of every interaction for post-hoc review.
Reporting that scales with cohort size
The pain: Class of 10 generates instant reports. Class of 10,000 times out the dashboard.
Our approach: Pre-computed aggregate tables. Materialized views refreshed on a schedule. Reports as snapshots, not live queries. Live data available on-demand for individual students; aggregates always pre-computed.
Integration with institution SIS or HRIS
The pain: Each institution has a different SIS, PowerSchool, Banner, Workday, custom, and the LMS needs to sync rosters, grades, and student data with each one.
Our approach: Integration adapter pattern. Common LMS interface, per-system adapters that handle the specific SIS API. New integrations become 2-week scoped projects, not platform rewrites.
Accessibility and WCAG conformance
The pain: Institutional buyers require WCAG 2.1 AA conformance. The LMS was built without it and retrofitting is hundreds of pages of fixes.
Our approach: Accessibility audit + remediation. Component library hardened to WCAG. Automated accessibility testing in CI. Conformance evidence documented for procurement. Accessibility from then on becomes a default, not a sprint.
Methodology tuned for platforms at scale.
- 01
LMS scope definition (weeks 1-3)
What courses look like in your model. How students progress. How assessment works. How instructors author and grade. The shape of the LMS comes from the shape of your pedagogy, not from a feature list.
- 02
Core LMS build (weeks 4-20)
Course structure, enrollment, content delivery, assessment engine, gradebook, instructor tools, student dashboard. The non-negotiable foundation. Built modularly so new features extend rather than fork.
- 03
Standards and integrations (weeks 16-28)
SCORM, xAPI, LTI. SIS or HRIS integration. SSO. Standards-compliance is heavy work, sequenced after the core LMS is stable so each integration is built into a known foundation.
- 04
Multi-tenant rollout (weeks 24+)
If selling to multiple institutions or brands, the multi-tenant rollout follows once the core LMS is proven. Tenant isolation, per-tenant configuration, self-service tenant onboarding. See multi-tenant page for the pattern.
250,000+ daily users. Multi-tenant by design.
Our multi-tenant EdTech platform powers white-label brands including Your CA Buddy and Youth Pathshala. It holds 250,000+ daily active users, 10 million requests per minute at peak, and has sustained zero downtime through three major scaling migrations. Every pattern on this page, the architecture, the decisions, the approach, has been battle-tested there first.
READ THE PLATFORM STORYHow the platform scaled from 20K to 250K daily active users over 3 years.Read case study →Questions founders ask about this.
When should we build a custom LMS instead of using Moodle, Canvas, or Open edX?+
When the workflow is unique to your model, most off-the-shelf LMS products are designed for traditional academic semester-based learning. If you are running cohort-based courses, micro-credentials, white-labeled brand experiences, or competency-based progression, off-the-shelf gets fought every day. Custom is also right when LMS-as-product is part of your business model, not just internal tooling.
What standards should a custom LMS support?+
SCORM 1.2 and 2004 if you need compatibility with existing course content libraries. xAPI (Tin Can) for richer learning analytics. LTI 1.3 for integration with publisher tools and other learning platforms. WCAG 2.1 AA for accessibility. Most custom LMS products support 2-3 of these depending on use case, full SCORM compatibility specifically is heavy and we recommend it only if existing course libraries are a hard requirement.
How do you handle gradebook and assessment at scale?+
Assessment engine and gradebook are separate services. Assessment delivery scales independently of grading, a deadline rush of 40,000 submissions does not block the gradebook. Auto-grading runs async. Manual grading queues by instructor. Grade calculations use materialized views so report cards do not lock the platform.
What about content authoring tools, buy or build?+
Almost always buy or integrate. Authoring is a saturated market (Articulate Rise, Storyline, H5P) and competing with them is rarely worth the engineering cost. Build the LMS to import their output via SCORM/xAPI. Save engineering for the parts of your workflow that are actually differentiated.
Multi-tenant LMS for selling to institutions, what changes?+
Tenant isolation at every data layer. Per-tenant branding through configuration. Per-tenant integration with their SIS (PowerSchool, Banner, Workday, etc.). Per-tenant SSO. SLA tracking per tenant. Most custom institutional LMS products are multi-tenant by design from day one, see our multi-tenant page for the architecture pattern.